Vomiting & the Fast (al-Qayʾ wa al-Ṣiyām)
Overcome by it, you owe nothing; induce it, and you make the day up.
This whole page, in one pocket book
Deliberate versus involuntary vomiting while fasting — the one hadith that settles it, and what it means for your fast — an A5 guide.
- The ruling in brief
- The ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah
- Deliberate vs. involuntary, explained
- Practical situations answered
The Ruling in Brief
The Sunnah draws a clear line between two situations. If a fasting person is overcome by vomiting — it rises without their intending or provoking it — the fast remains valid and nothing is owed. But if a person deliberately induces vomiting, the fast is broken and that day must be made up (qaḍāʾ). This is the position of the majority of the scholars, including the four well-known schools, and it rests directly on an explicit ḥadīth of the Prophet ﷺ.
The Ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah
The foundation of this ruling is the narration of Abū Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), who reported that the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said:
مَنْ ذَرَعَهُ الْقَيْءُ فَلَيْسَ عَلَيْهِ قَضَاءٌ، وَمَنِ اسْتَقَاءَ عَمْدًا فَلْيَقْضِ
"Whoever is overcome by vomiting, then he is not required to make up (the fast), and whoever vomits on purpose, then he must make it up."
Jami' at-Tirmidhi 720 · also Sunan Abi Dawud 2380Sahih — graded authentic by al-Albani (a Sunan ḥadīth, not in the two Ṣaḥīḥs)
The wording is precise. Dharaʿahu al-qayʾ means the vomit "got the better of him" — it forced its way up. Istaqāʾa ʿamdan means he sought it out and brought it up on purpose. The one who is a passive victim owes nothing; the one who acts owes the day. This ḥadīth is reported in the Sunan (not in the two Ṣaḥīḥs) and was graded ṣaḥīḥ in the site's hadith repository.
Being Overcome vs. Inducing It — the Fiqh
"Deliberate" vomiting includes putting a finger down the throat, deliberately smelling something to force it up, pressing the stomach with the intent to expel its contents, or staring at something in order to become nauseous. All of these fall under istiqāʾ ʿamdan, and the fast is broken.
By contrast, feeling nauseous, tasting bile at the back of the throat, or vomiting because of illness, travel-sickness, or a strong smell one could not avoid — none of this breaks the fast, because it is not sought. A related point the jurists mention: if vomit rises to the mouth and the fasting person swallows it back down on purpose, that is blameworthy, whereas expelling it or having it come back involuntarily does no harm. When in doubt whether a rising was truly involuntary, the default is that the fast remains valid, since certainty is not removed by doubt.
Points of Scholarly Difference (Ikhtilāf)
Two honest differences deserve mention, framed with respect for the scholars involved.
First, the ḥadīth's chain. Some early critics questioned this narration. It is reported that Imām al-Bukhārī and Imām Aḥmad expressed reservation about the strength of one of its routes. Later ḥadīth scholars, however — including al-Albānī — judged that its supporting chains and witnesses raise it to the level of ṣaḥīḥ. We report this transparently: the ruling is acted upon by the vast majority precisely because the ḥadīth is established, and where classical criticism existed it has been weighed, not hidden.
Second, the threshold of "a mouthful." The Ḥanafīs and some others discuss whether deliberate vomiting breaks the fast only when it reaches a full mouthful (milʾ al-fam), with smaller amounts treated differently. Others take the ḥadīth at its apparent meaning — any deliberate vomiting breaks it. There is likewise discussion over whether phlegm or bile brought up is judged the same as food. These are questions of applying an agreed principle, not of denying it, and the disagreement is one of understanding, not of authority.
The Wider Principle: Ease and the Pardon of the Unintended
This ruling is a clear instance of a broader mercy in the Sharīʿah: a person is not held to account for what overtakes them without choice. Allah ties the very legislation of fasting to ease, not hardship:
يُرِيدُ اللَّهُ بِكُمُ الْيُسْرَ وَلَا يُرِيدُ بِكُمُ الْعُسْرَ
Allah intends ease for you, and does not intend hardship for you.
Quran 2:185
The one whom vomiting overcomes has done nothing to earn a make-up, and the Sharīʿah does not burden them with one. The same principle stands behind the well-established teaching that this Ummah is pardoned for what it does by mistake, in forgetfulness, or under compulsion — reported in the Sunan and authenticated by the scholars of ḥadīth. Fasting is meant to be worship, not anxiety: the person who is genuinely overcome should continue their fast with a settled heart, and the person who deliberately provoked vomiting simply makes up one day, without expiation and without despair.
Rulings from Quran & Hadith
Evidence-based answers to common masāʾil, each with its daleel.
📖Sahih al-Bukhari & Muslim
Read the authentic collections these rulings draw on.
❓Questions & Answers
500+ answered questions across belief, worship, and life.
Share this page as a poster
A 1080×1920 image made for phone screens — Stories, Status, Reels. It carries the heading and the link back here, so whoever you send it to can read the whole thing.
On a phone you can also long-press the poster and choose Save image. Every poster is on the poster page. Free to share — no attribution needed.